This is a citizen blog. Visit http://eurekatownship-mn.us/ to sign up for the Township newsletter.

Friday, March 22, 2019

The Eureka Commercial-Industrial

Work Group Rolls Down The Track!


On March 20, I attended a Commercial-Industrial work group
meeting. In attendance were Mark Ceminsky, Butch Hansen,
Ralph Fredlund, Al Novacek, Merritt Clapp-Smith, Senior
Planner TKDA and three citizens.

                                     meeting clipart
The following updated memo was distributed by the Planner:

General Project Description: Evaluate the feasibility of
introducing independently serviced commercial and
industrial properties in Eureka Township. If determined feasible,
amend the Eureka Township Comprehensive Plan and
Township zoning districts to allow new commercial and
industrial uses.

Project Status: I (Merritt Clapp-Smith) have reviewed the four
concept zone districts and where they might apply in the Township.
I suggest that two districts - Light Industrial and Neighborhood
Commercial - could be sufficient to accomplish the land use
groupings envisioned. The districts could be written very simply
and include an example of the types of uses allowed, without 
needing to list every type of use possible. Each district would
be accompanied by clear lot design standards, which would
ensure organized and attractive development.

Deciding where to locate commercial and industrial districts
can be based on a number of factors.

Desired condition for commercial and industrial properties:
     * proximity to major roadways

     * access to or ability to provide necessary utilities

     * moderate land costs

     * reasonable site design standards

     * convenient access to/for consumers

Highest and best use of the land:
     * What would the private market want to use the land for,
        based on its location, amenities and natural features?

     * Can the land accommodate a use that is needed and 
        otherwise hard to find in the community, such as
        fertile agricultural soil or aggregate resources?
      
     * Does the land have natural amenities or resources that
        add value to the community or the region and should be
        preserved?

     * What is the opportunity cost of using the land for one
        type of land use versus another?

Compatibility with surrounding land uses:

     * Commercial land uses are best located adjacent to denser
        residential areas, where they have good visibility and 
        convenient access to consumers.

     * Commercial land uses will benefit from public amenities such 
        as lighting, boulevards or sidewalks, making the area attractive
        to visitor, and blending into the adjacent residential areas.
        Commercial uses will seek good visibility from roadways, but
        require good ingress and egress for customers, so location
        on busy highways without protected turn lanes can be a
        challenge.

     * Industrial buildings and properties are often placed away from
        residential uses, or if adjacent, they are heavily screened and
        buffered.`

     * Industrial land uses are focused on production, processing and
        storage, with few consumer visits. they can therefore be located 
        further from population centers and may not need the same
        level of public amenities as commercial.

     * Industrial uses with high levels of vehicle trips, will seek
        locations on or near major roadways.

The Planner advised the Work Group to prepare a map with
land use designations which would be acceptable to the Met
Council. There is no reason to spend time and money on it
if the MET Council will not approve.

The next steps would be a Board presentation with the Planner
present, Public review and an Open House.
                           
Image result for clip art annual meeting
My Input from the Annual Meeting follows:

Commercial Industrial work group and TKDA Planner:
There was discussion regarding the proposed $14,000
expenditure to study the feasibility of Commercial/Industrial
zoning in Eureka Township.
A motion was made by Gene Dietz "To suspend any further
expenditures in 2019 for the purpose of establishing a
Commercial/Industrial zone in Eureka Township. The Township
would have a ballot referendum at the 2020 Township election to
give all citizens an opportunity to vote yes or no on further
expenditures to establish a Commercial/Industrial zone within
the Township in the next five years. CUP's for non agricultural
businesses will continue to be processed by the Township
Supervisors as they have done in the past."
Mark Ceminsky stated the Township cannot issue conditional
use permits for businesses.
The motion passed 36-18. 
(See previous blog).

Although this motion is not binding, I believe the Board of Supervisors 
need to seriously consider the above motion and the will of the citizens.







No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.