This is a citizen blog. Visit http://eurekatownship-mn.us/ to sign up for the Township newsletter.

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

HERE'S THE SCOOP!

        August Town Board meeting on August 13, 2018.


     A Lakeville citizen approached the Planning Commission
on August 7 regarding purchasing 10 acres on County Road 86
for the purpose of constructing a business building of 
approximately 9,000 square feet to house their distribution of
items for agriculture producers.

     The items they distribute include farm aprons, pouches, totes,
belts, holsters, bags, boots, bibs and pants, children's gear, jackets,
breeding and vet gear, calf blankets and milking supplies.
(Information found on their web site.)

     The Planning Commission stated this is not a permitted use
and is not an agricultural service. They did indicate they could
possibly request a Conditional Use Permit and passed it onto 
the Town Board for discussion.

     Butch Hansen believes it falls under Agricultural Use.
The Ordinance definition of Agricultural Operations is:
"Operations operating for profit which include, but not
limited to, the cultivation, growing, harvesting and processing
of any agricultural commodity, including horticulture and
timber, the raising of livestock, fur-bearing animals, fish or
poultry; or any commercial agricultural practice
performed as incidental to or in conjunction with such
operations, including preparation for market, delivery to
storage, to market, or to carriers for transportation to market".
(I do not see the storage of aprons, holsters, bags, pants etc 
included in this definition).

     Butch Hansen stated "It is an allowed usage under a
Conditional Use Permit."  PC Chair Fredlund disagreed stating,
"A Conditional Use Permit is allowed for Agricultural Services."
Butch Hansen stated "This is an Agricultural Service."
Commissioner Funk indicated that it is a warehouse for storing
merchandise. Butch stated "They manufacture it there."
(I have seen nothing to indicate this statement is accurate.)
Hansen stated, "People are doing the exact same thing all over
the Township." 
The Ordinance states, "Agricultural  service is permitted
as a Conditional Use. Agricultural Service is described as
establishments primarily engaged in performing agricultural
or horticultural services on a fee or contract bases."
(I do not see where a warehouse utilized for storage of aprons,
holsters, pants, children's gear, jackets and sleeves, holsters and
bib pants is an Agricultural Service on a fee or contract
basis. (Mr. Hansen, if you do not have access to an Ordinance
book, please request a copy from the Town Hall.)

     Butch Hansen felt the Board needed to discuss the issue.

     Mark Ceminsky stated "The Statute under Agriculture allows
that even if you only have one acre, that if you are doing things
that provide to an Agricultural industry or supporting Agriculture,
it does not matter if you repair tractors or whatever you are allowed
under the Agricultural State Statute." (Not sure where this incoherent
statement by Mark was pulled from).
     Under the Ordinance definition of Agriculture: "The use of land
for the production of farm crops as well as for the raising of
livestock."

     Under the Ordinance definition of Commercial Agriculture:
"The exclusive use of ten (10) or more contiguous acres of
land for the production of field crops, livestock products,
or livestock, not counting one acre for homestead." (It then
goes on to define the above. I did not notice any reference to
aprons, bib pants, children's gear etc.) 

     (This would not be a permitted Accessory Structure.) The
Ordinance states, "There can be no Accessory Structure without
a Principal Structure existing on the same parcel."

     Commissioner Larson stated she felt the Planning Commission's
hands are tied when they do not have access to the Township attorney.
Chair Murphy stated "The Attorney prefers to have questions from
the Planning Commission Chair in writing rather than coming to the
meetings." He also stated "If the Planning Commission would
like to have the Attorney attend a specific meeting, they can 
request his presence."
(In the past, the Attorney attended the Planning Commission meetings
which makes sense because citizens' questions can be answered
or their permit requests can be addressed, recommended for approval or
turned down at the Planning Commission meeting. Possibly
saving the citizens another fruitless meeting).

     A citizen reminded the Board Supervisors that Agricultural
Services such as tractor repair and machinery repair is a service.
Products such as aprons, bib pants etc. are  NOT a service
for a fee or on a contract basis.

(The Attorney remained silent on this issue. Why???
This seems to be a time at a meeting when an attorney 
with expertise in municipal law needs to weigh in
to educate the Board and the Planning Commission.
Supervisors and Planning Commissioners have
a responsibility to reference the facts before making 
definitive statements.")

(Imagine if the Township issued Conditional Use Permits
willy nilly to anyone who would like to utilize
10 acres, or more or less, as storage for manufactured 
products or even worse, manufacturing, anyplace in
an agriculturally zoned Township.")

(If previous Planning Commissioners and Board Supervisors
have made mistakes in the past, current members are
not obligated to make the same mistakes, nor should they.)
 

     
The information is taken from
the August 13 meeting CD.  My
opinions are indicated in italics.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.